|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
A selection of
news items relating to land issues from the pages of Fios, the award
winning community newspaper that serves northern Lewis |
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
| |
| |
|
Fios ballot
results unveiled
The high
profile ballot in the last issue of this paper closed on Tuesday 1 June
with 433 responses submitted in all. The results show a clear majority
of 56% against the proposed Lewis Windpower development and a further
33% in favour. The results were categorized by area, and in the Ness
region, the vote was even more marked, with just under 60% against. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Galson Estate
Trust and the Cross-Skigersta question
A LEADING
crofting lawyer has advised that the anomaly of the 500 acre Cross-Skigersta
estate in a crofting community ‘should be drawn to the attention of
Ministers at the earliest possible opportunity.’ Derek Flyn of Macleod &
MacCallum, Solicitors of Inverness, acknowledged by the Law Society as a
specialist in crofting law, has advised that ‘there is no logical reason for
excluding the Cross-Skigersta holdings from the Galson Crofting Community
body’.
In a letter
to the Steering Group he states:
‘The question is whether a crofting community body is to comprise only
crofting townships within an existing estate or is the wording of the Land
Reform Act flexible enough to include (a) non-crofting townships and their
occupants and (b) townships and tenants of contiguous or adjacent estates.
In the present case the question is whether the occupiers of the fishermen’s
holdings at Cross Skigersta (who are of like economic status as crofters)
should be included in the Galson Crofting Community Body.’
Mr Flyn draws
attention to the provisions of the Land Reform Act which allows ministers to
approve the definition of the crofting community. On the formation of the
Galson Estate Trust he comments; ‘The company which is being formed is
intended to include and unite the whole community in the Galson area. It
will, of course, become the crofting community body if required for the
purposes of the Act. It is the vehicle by which the crofting community can
apply to buy eligible croft land (e.g. Galson Estate) but that is not its
only purpose.
The area of
benefit is the Galson area and this includes all the crofting townships
there. It must also benefit the occupiers of the holdings at
Cross-Skigersta. In my view the purpose of the legislation is not to limit
activity but to encourage it; not to fix communities but to allow them to
develop’.
The question
of whether tenants of the fishermen’s holdings can be classed as crofters is
not addressed. Many Cross-Skigersta residents, who make up one fifth of the
population of Ness, are of the view that full crofter status, with equal
rights to the common land, is the only way forward. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
The North Lewis Wind Farm Debate
Join the fios ballot and make sure you
have your say
A show of
hands at meetings and postal ballots are the usual ways to arrive at
decisions on community issues. Clearly postal ballots are very expensive but
are likely to deliver more accurate results , as was evident from the 2001
ballot on the Ness-Tolsta road link. This issue had been on the agenda for
decades and a ballot of households in Ness and Tolsta gave a return of 466
people from Ness in favour of the link (86%) and 75(14%) against it. A very
clear majority by any standard and quite an achievement to get over 500
people from Ness to give an opinion – this level of response could never be
obtained at a public meeting. Unfortunately we will NOT have a formal vote
on the proposed wind farm but fios readers are encouraged to
let us know their views by completing the form enclosed with this issue. To
ensure that results are as accurate as possible we will only count votes
made on the paper provided.
Below are
some, but by no means all, of the argumnets for and against the proposed
development. Maps and other details of the windfarm have been published in
earlier issues and, on the basis of the information available, you are
invited to answer the question: ‘Are you in favour of the Lewis Wind Power
proposed windfarm on the Galson, Barvas and Stornoway estates?’ By placing
an X in the appropriate box and returning the form to Fios, Ness Hall, NESS,
Isle of Lewis, HS2 0SW in the stamped envelope provided, you too will be
able to have your say. Responses by 1 June please. We will also welcome
votes by email from subscribers to the electronic version of fios. |
| |
|
The
great debate on windfarm developments on Lewis |
| The Case For..... |
The Case Against..... |
|
Population figures for the Western Isles show an alarming rate of
decline with a projected decrease of 17% by 2018. North Lewis has
suffered more than most areas and our local population is decreasing in
size as fast as it is increasing in age. A failing economy and a
distinct lack of opportunity drives our youngsters off the island in
search of better times. What are we to do about this worrying trend? Sit
back and watch the single biggest development opportunity in local
history pass us by? The proposed Lewis Wind Power development would
bring jobs, money, and life back to North Lewis.
Yes, the
imposing 100s strong army of white turbine towers will change our
landscape – maybe even for ever. But if we do nothing, there will be no
one here to admire the view, no matter how stunning it remains. Let us
grasp the great potential this development will bring and take pride in
the fact that we will be playing our part in a green energy revolution
that will change the world. |
As the
political pressure for green energy production grows, more and more wind
farm are springing up across the country - and more and more planning
applications are being refused as communities realise the enormous
impact these turbines make on their lives. So where else can the
developers go? To the Western Isles, of course, where a downward
spiralling economy has forced a desperate local authority to accept what
would have been unacceptable elsewhere.
The
turbines planned for north Lewis are huge and will be unmatched for size
anywhere in the world. At a minimum height of 120 m, the turbines will
dominate our landscape, shattering the as yet untapped potential of the
Western Isles tourist industry. This rare and remarkable landscape and
the species its supports our under our protection. If the wind farm
comes, future generations will not easily forgive us for signing away
this environmental paradise - now matter how lucrative the deal. |
|
⇑ The new
wind farm will make a major contribution to the green energy revolution
saving around 1.3 million tones of CO2 emissions and meeting 29% of
Scotland’s green energy target
⇑ The
income from the farm will generate around £2 million per annum for the 3
estates and the same figure again for the crofters. The Community funds
set up on the three estates will raise £1000 per megawatt installed –
which translates to roughly £700,000 per annum depending the farm’s
final capacity.
⇑ The
development itself will create a lot of building industry work during
its construction period and at least 3 maintenance jobs thereafter
⇑ The
developer’s lease is for 35 years – if at the end of that period the
island decide the turbines are too much trouble, the developer is
legally bound to remove them if the lease is not renewed
⇑ The
development will involve many new roads – opening up the heart of the
moor for fishing and other sporting activities
⇑ The
party of Lewis visitors newly returned from the High Volts farm in near
Hartlepool came back with a positive report, allaying most fears of
noise pollution |
⇑ The
visual impact of 100s of giant giant turbines and their associated
pylons can not be over estimated. There is almost no area of North Lewis
from which they will be hidden from view – and for some, the structures
will be only 1.5km from their homes
⇑ The
cumulative noise of these turbines has not been fully assessed in this
setting. Hearing the sound from three turbines close to a busy motorway
does not represent a relevant example. Noise carries far in these quiet
parts
⇑ The
moor on which the turbines are to be stood is protected under Scottish
and European law - and for good reason. It is of enormous environmental
importance supporting important species of flora and fauna
⇑ Rare
and important bird populations are likely to be severely damaged – birds
will be killed and their breeding grounds disrupted. The RSPB is
expected to object to planning for just this reason
⇑ Endless
lorries transporting mountains of concrete and rubble along our roads
will have a detrimental impact on both our roads, our health and our
children’s safety |
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Estate
Trust
established
URRAS
OIGHREACHD GHABHSAINN, the Galson Estate Community Trust became a legal fact
last Monday evening, 17 May, when the new company’s memorandum and articles
were signed by the steering group’s Chairman and Secretary, James MacDonald
and Neil Finlayson, who are standing in as interim directors. Urras
Oighreachd Ghabhsainn will be registered as a charitable company limited by
guarantee with Companies House in the next few days and the pipe dream for
which the steering group has worked so hard, will become a very definite,
reality.
Steering
Group Chairman James Macdonald told fios, ‘this is an exciting moment for
everyone involved and will herald a lot of activity over the coming few
weeks. Now that the Trust is up and running, we will be recruiting members
and electing directors.
The
feasibility Study is due to be unveiled by consultants Strutt and Parker and
this will give us all a chance to see for ourselves the true possibilities
of community ownership. The new post of Community Buy-Out Co-ordinator
should be up and operational by the end of June and will provide a central
point of contact for all enquiries about the buyout.
Mr Macdonald
outlined the next steps in the drive to ensure the whole community has an
opportunity to take part in the process. He said: “We will petition every
eligible member of the community to join us. Membership of the new company
is open to all residents in the Ness to Upper Barvas area, as well as Galson
Estate croft tenants who reside within 16 kilometres of the estate’s
boundary. House occupiers on adjacent land that shares a common boundary
with croft or grazings land on the Galson Estate are also eligible for
membership. However, one over-riding consideration is that persons seeking
membership must be registered on the electoral roll and be entitled to vote
in Comhairle nan Eilean’s local government elections.”
The Trust
will shortly be issuing a newsletter to every home explaining the procedure.
Mr Macdonald added, “as always the steering group will be more than happy to
help with any enquiries”. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Wind farm visit
LOCAL MEN Angus Smith (Dell), James Macleod (Swainbost),
Donald Mackay (Galson) and Angus Morrison (Airidhantuim) joined a 16-strong
party of community council representatives on a visit to a working wind farm
in the north of England on Wednesday.
AMEC subsidiary Lewis
Wind Power organised the trip to let local people see and hear for
themselves what wind turbines in action are like. The visit centred on the
High Volts Windfarm near Hartlepool which has three turbines of a
similar size to those proposed for the Galson Estate. Also making the trip,
were representatives of the Stornoway Trust who had independently chartered
a plane from Stornoway Airport. The
Community Council representatives left for Hartlepool on Wednesday and
returned on Thursday. A full report of their findings will be published in
the next issue of Fios. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Crofters unite
in the face of an uncertain future
At
a meeting
in Lionel School on Tuesday, 4 May, crofting representation from the entire
Galson Estate area met to discuss the way forward in the face of growing
concerns and uncertainty about the wind farm development. Representatives
from Ness General, Upper Barvas, Ballantrushal, Galson Moor, and Galson
thrashed out a course of action which would give voice to the entire
crofting community and present a united front in all future discussions with
Lewis Wind Power.
No firm decisions
have yet been made but many of the townships have agreed with the
development in principle with certain reservations regarding the proximity
of the turbines to the houses. At present, South Dell has decided to raise
its objection to the wind farm, while Galson, has given its full backing to
the development as it now stands.
Although the local
crofting lobby’s final position with regard to the wind farm has yet to be
clarified, the meeting on Tuesday did make several decisions that will shape
future discussions with the developers. The map released by Lewis Wind
Power last week gives a clear indication of where the turbines on the Galson
Estate are likely to be sited and, in a few cases, the turbines are placed
as close as 1.5km to the nearest homes. The group intend to write to Lewis
Wind Power and ask that some of the turbines closest to nearby houses be
moved. The decision was also made to request, on behalf of the entire
crofting community, that the Heads of Agreement already signed between the
estate and the developer, be made public. As yet, neither the soon to be
established Galson Estate Trust, nor the crofting community have any firm
idea of how the payment from the proposed development will be structured.
The committee made
a unanimous decision to temporarily withhold distribution of the Peatland
Management Scheme funds with the view to hiring a lawyer to look into the
crofters’ legal position and make sure that all alternative options to full
resumption were properly investigated. Lewis Wind Power parent company AMEC
are to be approached with regard to setting up a crofters’ fund for legal
representation as soon as possible and it is hoped that the lawyer’s fees
will be paid from this sum.
The chairmen of
both Ness General and Galson Moor have urged all townships to hold further
meetings to discuss the development with their own shareholders. Ness
General Chairman, Angus Maclean added, “The wind farm issue is picking up
speed. I suggest it is of the utmost importance – for our generation and the
next – that we are up and running with it. We must all work together and
ensure our crofting interests are not left behind.” |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Leaked AMEC map
reveals turbine locations
After
months of refusing to reveal the precise location of the 300 turbines
destined for the North Lewis Wind Farm, AMEC front man John Price was
forced to admit that a map leaked last week does, in fact show, the
whereabouts of each of the structures. Mr Price was unable to say how
the map had got into the public domain and confirmed that, while the
details it shows are unlikely to change considerably, there is a
possibility that the locations may be altered again before the planning
application is lodged in June. The map is alleged to have been left
behind at the Bragar School meeting last week in which Mr Price faced a
large and hostile audience.
At the Ness meeting the following
evening, the reception was less vocal but concerns were raised on a
number of points, most crucially, the proximity of the turbines to
houses. The maps show the proposed location of each turbine and of the
accompanying new site roads. The map also shows public roads, marked as
white lines interspaced by black dots, which, in some cases, extend
beyond the existing road network |

Click images to
enlarge |
 |
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Public
consultation on proposed community buyout
THE Galson
Community Land Ownership Steering Group is currently awaiting a report on
the feasibility of community ownership of the Galson Estate. The study is
being carried out by Aberdeenshire based chartered surveyors, Strutt &
Parker, who recently made a factfinding visit to the island during which
they met community and crofting representatives. The Steering Group has also
secured the services of crofting law expert Derek Flynn of Inverness based
legal firm, MacLeod & McCallum.
Though future
renewable energy projects on island estates have received much publicity
over the past year, consultants Strutt & Parker have been instructed to
assess the viability of a community owned estate that would not necessarily
receive lucrative revenues from future windfarms. As part of the
consultation process, the Galson Community Land Ownership Steering Group
will be hosting public meetings on Tuesday 20th April
and Wednesday 21st
April at the Ness Hall and Airidhantuim School, respectively.
Though it is
unlikely that Strutt & Parker will have completed its report by these dates,
the Steering Group is anxious to keep crofters and residents fully informed
on progress and to offer the public every opportunity to offer its views and
contribute to the consultation process. It is anticipated that these and
future public meetings will enable crofters and those living on the Galson
Estate to explore all the issues relating to a community buyout, including
the establishment of a Trust to manage the affairs of a new community owned
estate. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Turbine trial pits abandoned
Lewis
Wind Power (LWP) will not now be applying for planning consent for the
exploratory excavations at the selected sites on the Ness moor. This
follows objections from local crofters. North Dell township expressed
strong views on the proposal for tests on the North Dell moor at a
meeting on 29 March and Skigersta township also expressed concerns about
the plans for a trial pit at the other Ness site. |
 |
The Ness
General Grazings committee at its meeting on Tuesday agreed in principle to
the proposal but recommended that the test site be away from peat banks and
back filled with hard core. This did not imply that any new test site was
agreed as a location for a turbine. Tom Brinicombe, Wind Energy PR and
Communications Officer for AMEC Project Investments Limited issued a
statement last week apologizing ‘for the apparent haste that has caused
annoyance within the local community’.
However LWP
this week said that the information they would have gleaned on peat and rock
structures was not absolutely necessary prior to submitting the planning
application but that they may be asked to provide this information by the
statutory bodies at a later date. LWP has also given an assurance that they
will forward the plans for turbine locations and access roads to those with
a crofting interest to get their views before they submit their planning
application. It is understood that these plans are now almost complete. |
| |
|
 |
| |

The 16 x 16 x 5m ‘footprint’ of one of the 300 wind turbines |
In the footsteps of
giants
LEWIS WIND
Power (LWP) hosted a public meeting at Lionel School last Monday and
over fifty people gathered to hear what little new information the
energy giants had to offer. Despite being only three months away from
their planning application and having spent £3 million on the project so
far, LWP appear to have made little headway in the public consultation
process and have still to make any formal contact with the crofting
bodies whose agreement will be crucial to them in the coming months. |
John Price of AMEC
confirmed that LWP had signed ‘Heads of Agreement’ with the Galson Estate
which he believed would be legally binding were the estate to change hands
and would preclude other wind farm developments going ahead on the estate.
A map showing
where the 120m high turbines are likely to be placed was presented at the
meeting and can be viewed at Ness Hall. Photographic material was also
shown, see above, which gave an idea of the sheer scale of each structure.
Mr Price advised that the ‘footprint’ of each of the 300 turbines was 16 x
16 x 5 metres, which, together with around 150km of 5m wide roads, would
take a substantial amount of land out of crofting tenure. Mr Price
reaffirmed the company’s wish to use island based quarries to produce the
massive tonnage of rock required for the ground work.
The total project
cost is estimated at £400 million and the farm is expected to produce an
annual income of around £90 million each year of its minimum 20 year life.
Mr Price stated that the total output of the farm was expected to be around
600 megawatts per year and confirmed that Galson Estate had agreed a minimum
community payment of £1000 per megawatt installed. He also estimated that up
to 20% equity could be made available to the community if it chose to invest
in the project.
The wind farm is
expected to make a major contribution to the UK’s green energy production
targets and, as Mr Price was keen to point out, could generate hundreds of
jobs on the island while construction was under way and a further 30
permanent maintenance posts once the farm is up and running. LWP were
unable to comment on the details of the studies so far commissioned but did
promise that all studies would be available to the public when the planning
application is lodged in June.
Questions were
asked concerning LWP’s commitment to the North Lewis Community and to public
consultation in general; one web literate member of the audience pointing
out that the company had failed to update its own website since May 2002.
Another member of the audience asked about LWP’s ability to run such a major
project when its founding company, British Energy, had only recently been
bailed out by the government after going into administration.
Recent press
coverage has highlighted the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
position on the Galson Estate development and this has the potential to
jeopardise the LWP planning application. The RSPB have serious concerns for
the important populations of Red and Black Throated Divers, Golden Plovers,
Dunlins and Eagles that are found in the Special Protection Area of moorland
on which many of the turbines are to be built. Asked how confident he was
that the project would still go ahead, Mr Price replied, “We are very
confident that we will achieve planning permission in June. Perhaps less
confident that the Scottish and Southern inter connector will go ahead quite
so smoothly because of planning issues on the Scottish mainland.” |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
New
wind power alternative on the cards?
A NEW NAME has
emerged on the ever expanding renewable energy market which could not only
provide an alternative to the vast development now proposed by AMEC but
could add up to a better deal for the entire community. North Wind Energy (NWE),
a new company with strong island connections, has written to the Ness
Community Council offering to facilitate a small 5-10 turbine development
which could pay out significantly greater community dividends while reducing
the environmental impact on the site.
Alternatives to
the scale of development now on the cards with AMEC have always been
dismissed because a new inter-connector to transport electricity back to the
mainland grid could not be justified without such a big development going
ahead. NWE ,however, believe their proposals could go ahead with the
infrastructure that is now in place. Stewart Henderson of NWE spoke to Fios
this week, saying “We would be interested in delivering a small 5-10 turbine
scheme and do not see the absence of a new interconnector as any real bar to
such a development being achievable.”
The development
proposed by energy giants AMEC would involve the installation of 300 giant
2MW turbines, each producing 7000 MW each year, worth in the region of
£320,000 – that’s £96 million profit for AMEC each year. The current AMEC
deal on offer is expected to yield a community dividend of around £1000 per
year per MW, an annual total of around £300,000. In addition, the estate
owners and the crofters would split an additional payment between them.
NWE are proposing
to develop a small 10MW farm on the moor, generating around £1.6 million
each year, split equally between the community, the estate owners and the
development financiers to produce an estimated community profit of over
£530,000 each year. At last week’s meeting of Ness Community Council it was
agreed that further information would be sought on the new proposals. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
New status for Stiapabhat
(13
February 2004)
SCOTTISH NATURAL
HERITAGE have just announced an award of £3000 to Comunnn Eachdraidh Nis for
the installation of a bird hide and suitable signage at the Loch Stiapabhat
site in Knockaird. The announcement follows further awards from the
Comhairle’s Community Economic Development unit, the Ness Gateway Project
and from CEN itself, to secure funding for the entire £10,000 project. The
new hide is the first step in achieving proper recognition for this
important site which is due to be granted ‘Local Nature Reserve’ status
later this year, the first award of this kind in the Western Isles.
Andy Robinson of
SNH explained, “Stiapabhat is a very rare habitat in Lewis terms, enriched
by machair sands, its surrounding vegetation provides important coverage for
many species of birds, including the ever dwindling Corncrake.”
John Maciver of
CEN was delighted that the project had received the final go-ahead, saying
“An open meeting will now be convened and a managament committee established
to take this exciting project forward. This new status will come with new
responsibilities and SNH, the Comhairle and the Galson Estate, our partners
in the project, will all have a responsibility to ensure the reserve is well
managed and well promoted at a national and international level.” |
| |
| |
|
£16K award
for community buyout feasibility study
(30 Jan 2004)
FOLLOWING AN application by the Galson Community Land Ownership Steering
Group, The Scottish Land Fund have made an award of £16K to commission a
feasibility study of a Community Buyout and to cover any legal xpenses.
This is excellent news for the Steering Group, who will now have the
means to proceed with their strategy. |
|

|
|
|
Strutt &
Parker, the consultants appointed to undertake the study, were due to meet
with the Steering Group on Wednesday, 28 January, but were stranded in
Ullapool due to bad weather. The meeting went ahead with Sandra Holmes,
Community Land Advisor at the Scottish Land Fund and Derek Flynn, the
group’s solicitor, and kicked off a number of discussions to be held in the
community and to cover a wide cross section of the inhabitants.
The
Steering Group would welcome any input or questions appertaining to the
buyout. Members of the committee can be contacted via NDC on 810800. |
| |
|

|
| |
|
Fios - Ness Community Council
news (16 January 2004)
Representatives from the Land Buyout Steering Group raised the important
issue of land resumption in the ongoing negotiations between the Galson
Estate and Lewis Wind power.
It appears
that agreements are now being signed between the estate and the developers
that could result in a large area of crofting land being resumed from
crofting tenure without the prior consent of local crofting bodies.
The Community Council will be writing to the owners of the Galson Estate to
request an urgent meeting and demand that the local community be given a
seat at the negotiating table.
The Steering
Group also confirmed that the Feasibility Study into the possibility of a
community land buy-out was due to commence next week and that £10,900 had
been secured from the Community Land Unit for that purpose. |
| |
|

|
| |
|
Fios
- land ownership bulletin (02 January 2004) |
|
Some
questions and answers about local ownership of the Galson
Estate
As a result
of meetings held recently at Ness Development Centre, Dell, and Airidhantuim
School, between members of the Galson Community Land Ownership Steering
Group and representatives from the Townships Grazings Committees, a wish was
expressed for greater public awareness on the implications of the Community
Buyout. With this in mind the Steering Group list the following “Frequently
Asked Questions”. |
| |
|
Q. Why
change from the present situation? |
A. The Land Reform (Scotland Bill) gives crofting
communities a ‘right to buy without the prior consent of the landowner’.
There is no guarantee that the present absentee landlord will not sell
to a less passive owner. By becoming the owner, a crofting community can
put their interests first. |
|
Q Will
crofters still be able to get Crofting grants and loans? |
A Yes! Crofters will remain tenants of the estate – all
that happens is that the name of the landlord changes. The Stornoway
Trust crofters still obtain grants in the normal way. It is not like
decrofting. |
|
Q What
benefits are there? |
A Most importantly, that any revenue generated by the
estate remains within the community for the good of the community. Over
50% of the revenue currently generated goes to an absentee landlord. |
| |
Potential sources of income to the community include:
|
� |
Income from
designations such as SSS1, SAC or RAMSAR status |
|
� |
Rental from
renewables/forestry and access agreements for way-leaves |
|
� |
Mineral rights |
|
� |
Tourism and
recreational developments such as fishing |
|
� |
Income
from grants for looking after the heritage, culture and environment
on a scale
not previously possible |
|
� |
Sale of small plots
for business opportunities or to develop affordable
housing or
crofting initiatives |
|
|
Q How
much will it cost? |
A 6% of the value as assessed by an independent valuer.
94% of the purchase price should be available from the Scottish Land
Fund and Community Land Unit. |
|
Q How do
I know that I will have a say in what happens? |
A Democratic election of trustees along similar lines to
Stornoway Trust will ensure fairness and inclusion in any
decision-making. |
|
Q What if
it all goes wrong? |
A If set
up as a company limited by guarantee, members liabilities would be
limited – for example to £1 – if the Company were wound up. It is worth
mentioning, however, that none of the community buyouts assisted to date
have been wound
up. |
|
Q Does
the land to be used for development have to be resumed or
decrofted? |
A Not necessarily.
Crofters and crofting communities wanting to benefit from, wind farm
development on common grazings can achieve this through an agreement or
contract amongst all the shareholders and the landlord, which must be
approved by the Land Court. Due to uncertainty about whether such
contracts or agreements will be binding on the successors of the
parties, developers are apparently reluctant to proceed under this type
of arrangement. Developers will more than likely demand that the land is
resumed and whilst the crofting/community interest will benefit from any
initial
development
there
will be no benefit from any subsequent development.
There is a real danger
here of agreements being drawn up between the current landowner and a
developer where the interests of the crofters/community is being totally
ignored. It is of paramount importance that we
don’t sell our future generation’s birthright.
|
|
Q What is
the effect of resumption? |
A Once
the land is resumed, the crofters will have no say in what happens to
the land if it is used for the stated purpose. The crofter(s) must
effectively surrender the land once the landlord complies with the
conditions
imposed by the Land
Court in their Order.
The
Steering Group welcome any further questions in relation to the buyout
by contacting any member of the Steering Group Committee or Ness
Development Centre. |
|
| |
|

|
| |
|
Lewis Wind Power offer snubbed
(19 Dec 2003) |
|
Ness
Community Council has recommended that the Wind Farm Community Benefit Group
reject the offer of £5000 made to it by Lewis Windpower Ltd.
Following
discussion at Tuesday’s public meeting, John MacIver chair of Ness Community
Council said: “This Council was democratically elected by the people of Ness
and our unanimous decision this evening is that the Windfarm Benefit Group,
acting on behalf of the community, should reject this offer.”
The three
members of Ness Community Council on the group are Neil
Finlayson, James Macleod and Norman Thomson.
The letter
from Simon Fraser, Galson Estate factor, which was before the meeting also
stated: “The value of the community benefit which has been secured by the
estate, (acting along with Barvas Estate and the Stornoway Trust) will
ensure that a minimum of around £1000 per annum per installed megawatt
capacity will be paid to the community within the estate area. In Galson
Estate I estimate that this could possibly yield over £200,000 each year
once the windfarm is in production.”
The meeting
was informed that there had been no community representation at these
negotiations with the windfarm developer and there was concern that the
offer now on the table would prejudice any future negotiations.
The letter
from the Estate does not state how much the land owner is set to benefit but
previous estimates were £400,000 per annum. Some members expressed strong
views on the issue and in particular the present provisions which enable
land to be taken out of crofting tenure (resumption). |
| |
|

|
| |
|
Stormy times ahead for
Lewis Wind Power (21 November
2004)
At two public
meetings in Airidhantuim and Lionel schools on Wednesday evening, local
people had the opportunity to air their views on the proposed development of
a Lewis wind farm. Around thirty people turned out at each meeting to hear
Lewis Wind Power (LWP) partners Amec present their development plans for the
area. The company has completed initial environmental and technical surveys
and although they have now outlined the site for the farm, they have yet to
confirm the actual positioning of each turbine.
The proposed
area covers land under the Stornoway Trust and both the Galson and Barvas
estates. LWP plan to submit their formal planning application in June 2004
and the planning process is expected to last twelve months. The application
will include the exact location of each turbine and will be available for
public consultation as part of the formal planning process. Planning
permission must be approved by both Comhairle nan Eilean Siar and the
Scottish Executive and the crofting community will have the right to veto
the development if the majority so chose.
The project
depends on the installation of sub-sea cabling that would connect any Lewis
produced electricity to mainland Scotland. The cable is to be installed by
Southern and Scottish Energy PLC who are providing the interconnector as
part of their own development plans. Southern and Scottish will also have to
obtain planning permission for the cable itself and while it is believed
that the relevant planning bodies will hold no opposition to the cable as
such, there could be some resistance to the erection of the new pylons
required to carry the electricity through the mainland Highlands. If it
goes ahead, the wind farm will be the biggest of its kind ever constructed.
LWP hope to erect around 300 of the turbines spread evenly throughout the
three estates. Each one would stand around 120 meters tall, and would
include a 80m set of blades turning at around 25 revolutions per minute.
The turbines would be set 500m apart and be positioned at least 1.5km away
from any house.
Concerns were
raised at both meetings about the levels of noise pollution, which would
result from the development. John Price of Amec was insistent that noise
levels in residential areas could be guaranteed to remain at or below 35 dba,
a figure set to represent “a quiet bedroom”. At the Lionel meeting, John
Macritchie questioned the Amec team over the huge hard core requirements for
the project, estimated to be around 1.5m cubic tonnes. The access roads for
the site are planned to follow a spinal route running east of the main
Barvas to Ness road, accessed from some point near the Barvas end of the
main Stornoway road - and at almost 5m wide they will require a lot of rock.
It is expected that island quarries will be developed to supply this huge
demand, but LWP Project Manager Louise Pepper stated that the final plans
for procuring that stone had not been completed but would be detailed in the
planning application.
The question
of decommissioning the windfarm at the end of its twenty year expected life
span was raised by several members of the audience at Airidhantuim. Amec
representatives confirmed that the landowner had exacted a guarantee from
LWP in the form of an insurance policy that would cover the cost of
decommissioning should the company fold and be unable to pay for dismantling
site itself.
At both
meetings the thorny question of money was raised again and again. LWP
confirmed that 96% of the expected profits from the development would stay
in the LWP purse but insisted the small 4% remaining cash would bring huge
dividends to the community.
The
development is expected to cost LWP a total of around £450million and
include a loan to value rate of 80%, despite this, the project is expected
to net them around £1.4 billion over twenty years. The remaining 4% will be
divided between the landowners, the crofters and the community.
The Estates
will receive an annual income based upon a set rental charge, together with
a small percentage of each KWh of electricity sold. The crofters have two
options available to them. The land on which the turbines and access roads
are to be built can be resumed from crofting tenure and be given back to the
estate owners who will then rent it out to the developers. The land would no
longer be in crofting tenure and would net the crofter a one off capital
payment to be decided upon by the land Court. The second option would
require new legislation, but would allow the crofter to keep the land in
question and rent it out to the developers themselves, earning 50% of the
annual £1.25 million rental figure. At the end of the twenty year project,
the land would revert back to the crofters who could then re-negotiate for
any new wind farm development. A further £200,000 is expected to be paid on
an annual basis to an as yet unspecified community fund. That money would be
available to the entire community and would be managed in such a way as to
benefit all those who live on the estates in question. Although many
non-crofters would be living in the shadow of the turbines, they would have
no legal right to any of the rental income from the farm.
Katie Mary
Mackenzie raised the possibility of rejecting LWP’s plans in favour of a
smaller scale, community owned wind farm. A fifteen turbine development
would cost in the region of £15m, much of which could be funded through a
number of community renewables grants. Simon Fraser will be meeting with
the grazing committees early next week to ensure the crofters obtain the
best possible deal for the community if the farm does go ahead.
The results
of the planning application are not expected until June 05 and even if
permission is granted and the project does go ahead, work will not start
until well into 2006. LWP will be hope to hold monthly public meetings from
now on. |
| |
|

|
| |
|
Community
buy-out one step closer (7 November 2004)
Galson Estate
Crofting Community Land Ownership Steering Group this week sent out an
invitation to tender for the feasibility study that will form the basis of
any future bid to buy the land. The brief has been developed by the Group
after close consultation with the community and with assistance from both
the Community Land Unit and the Renewable Energy Unit.
The Group
announced that six separate consultancy firms had been invited to tender for
the job and a response has been requested by the end of this month. A
decision will be made soon after and a full feasibility study will be
carried out over succeeding months with a report expected to follow in the
first quarter of 2004. Public meetings will be held during this period and
the final report will be circulated widely in the community. If the
feasibility study proves a worthwhile case for community ownership then a
full ballot of the entire community would follow. Pending the results of
this ballot, a formal application to buy the land would be lodged with the
Scottish Executive. If in agreement, the Executive would order a valuation
of the land and the community would then have 21 days to fully commit to its
purchase - and a further 6 months to secure funding for the asking price.
Although the Scottish Land Unit would fund most of the cost, the community
would have to come up with 6% itself.
James
Macdonald, Chair of the Steering Group, commented: “Following wide public
consultation in the first half of 2003, the Steering Group has been
beavering away in the preparation of this brief and of relevant background
material. This feasibility study is a crucial stage for us and prepares the
way for what we believe will be a strong vote for Community Ownership of the
Galson Estate”.
With Europe’s
largest wind farm still very much on the cards for both Ness and Barvas, and
the prospect of over £1 million of rental income up for grabs each year, the
question of who owns this land remains a crucial issue. AMEC were due to
have lodged their planning application last month but progress has been
slower than anticipated with a mountain of regulations to be climbed. The
project is also dependent upon the new sub-sea connection to the mainland
grid which power giant Southern and Scottish Energy PLC are committed to
providing. |
| |
|

|
| |
|
Land Negotiations
Continue (18 July 2003)
Following the
offer by Barvas and Galson Estates to set up a community trust fund, public
meetings were held throughout the west side last week. At the Ness Community
Council meeting on Tuesday, there was strong criticism of the landowners for
negotiating with the windfarm developers without consulting the crofters or
the wider community. Later, at a joint meeting of representatives from Ness
to Shawbost, the view was that the community should not be rushed into
forming a trust at a pace to suit the landowners and developers, which might
cost the residents in the longer term. The community benefit working group
has taken the first steps towards achieving the best deal possible for the
communities of the Galson and Barvas Estates from the proposed wind farm
developments. This follows a series of rapid developments and the need for
the community as a whole to play an active part in setting their own agenda
for management of any benefits.
Special
meetings were held through out area and representatives from the Barvas and
Shawbost community councils will work with members of the community land
ownership steering group representing the Ness and Airidh an Tuim community
council areas. In this way, the land ownership question of the Galson Estate
will remain an important part of negotiations without proving a barrier to
working with others out with the estate to maximise the benefits for the
residents of the four community council areas. The steering group also
contributes the experience and knowledge about renewables gained in their
work over the past eight months.
By working
together the group want full community representation in negotiations
between the developers, crofters and landowners - If genuine in their
commitment to community involvement, AMEC and Lewis Wind Power should be
amenable to this. Any windfarm developed will have an impact on the
community for generations to come and any deals done now need the
community’s long term future into account. |
| |
|

|
| |
|
Galson and Barvas
landowners
offer £30,000 to start
community fund
(04 July 2003)
THE OWNERS of
Galson and Barvas estates have offered a joint payment of £30,000 to set up
a trust to manage the community fund element of the proposed 600MW Lewis
windfarm development.
At a meeting
with the four Community Councils serving Ness to Shawbost, owners of both
estates confirmed on Monday of last week that £10,000 would be made
immediately available, with a further - £20,000 when the developer and
estates had agreed the lease terms – expected to be within 3 months.
Sir Robert
Clerk, factor of the Barvas Estate, was accompanied by two members of the
Armitage family which owns the land. Representing the Galson Estate were
part-owner Sandy Graham and Finlay Boyd, a solicitor with Anderson MacArthur
& Co. Galson Estate factor Simon Fraser was unable to attend due to
ill-health.
Sir Robert
outlined the background to the proposed multi-million pound development on
moorland owned by the three Lewis estates of Galson, Barvas and the
Stornoway Trust. The developer – Lewis Wind Power Ltd - was expected to
agree that between 2.5%-5% of income from the sale of the power generated
would be available for distribution locally.
Apart from
the landowner, other beneficiaries set to share revenues from the renewable
energy development are: croft tenants on estate lands; people and amenities
within the estates through income from a ‘community fund’; and a ‘planning’
fund, which would be paid to the Comhairle for use on local government
financed projects throughout the Western Isles.
Sir Robert
said: “The crofters and the estates get about the same amount, and the
community fund would probably be about half of the landlord’s share.” Even
with the smallest share going into a community fund, “it represents a
massive input into the economy”.
He made it
clear that no firm figures were available at this stage but sums of between
£300,000 and 400,000 could be available to a Ness-Shawbost community fund
annually for up to 60 years once the full installation was up and running,
probably by 2010. There would also be payments each year in the construction
phase, expected to be from 2006.
The factor
confirmed what Lewis Wind Power (AMEC) had already stated at various public
meetings that most of the moor is a specially protected area and development
will have to be concentrated in a narrow strip between the protected area
and coastal villages. Within the protected area there is a special
conservation area in which no development will be permitted. But there may
be room for development outside this ‘strictly no-go’ area, though within
the protected land. This is subject to negotiations with the environmental
agencies.
Both estates
were in favour of establishing one organisation to represent the communities
from Ness to Shawbost. It was envisaged that this would eventually be a
charitable trust managed by elected representatives from each area. A firm
commitment to fund the set-up of the trust was given but it would be up to
the communities to decide how to proceed.
Responding to
questions about where exactly the structures would be sited, the factor said
that the location of each turbine would have to be declared in the planning
application, which will be available to the community. This was a matter for
AMEC, but he expected they would have the information sometime in the
Autumn. He was aware that AMEC had stated there would be extensive
consultation with all interested parties.
There was
criticism from the floor of the failure of Galson Estate owners to meet with
crofters and that negotiations had taken place with the developer and
agreements made, without any consultation. Sandy Graham said that they had
met the three Comhairle na Eilean Councillors for the area early on and had
given details of the AMEC proposal. He said he was also prepared to meet
crofting townships to deal with any questions.
Sir Robert
stated that the compensation for crofters was likely to be set by the Land
Court under existing provisions relating to resumption of common pasture
which was under crofting tenure and would be discussed with the Barvas
Estate crofters the following evening. Figures given at earlier meetings
predicted that individual crofters on the Galson estate would be entitled to
£1000 per annum and the three families which own the estate would share
£420,000 from an installed capacity of 300MW. Once the siting of turbines
is agreed, more accurate figures will be available but the formula of 80%
shared equally between crofters and the landowner with 20% for the community
fund was likely to be followed. Responding to further questions about how
the estate’s share would be calculated, the factor said: “It will be either
a fixed rent or a percentage of the electricity generated.”
Other
questions also focussed on the agreements between the landowners and Lewis
Wind - how the 2.5-5% allocation was arrived at, was of particular concern
to one individual.
Following the
meeting with the landowners, the representatives of the community councils
met to discuss the proposals. It was agreed that each of the four
organizations would call a special public meeting in their own area to get
the views of the wider community. One of the recommendations would be that
two representatives would be appointed to represent each area in a group
that would negotiate with the landowners and set up the community trust. It
would be up to each meeting to decide if one community fund for Ness-Shawbost
was appropriate. The Ness community is encouraged to attend a meeting in the
Ness Hall on Tuesday 8 July where the potential benefits and environmental
impact of wind power generation on the moor will be discussed. Decisions
made at the meeting could have an enormous affect on the area and its
inhabitants for generations to come. |
| |
|

|
| |
| Buttons the
Fios cartoon horse has his own views on crofting diversification: |
.jpg)
|
|
| |
|

|
| |
|
The big decision
(23 May 2003)
THE possibility of a community buy-out of the Galson Estate
came one step closer on Monday of last week when a public meeting in
Airidhantuim School granted the go-ahead for a full feasibility study into
the pros and cons of such a venture. Expected to cost between £8000 and
£20,000, the study will be funded by HIE’s Community Land Unit (CLU) and
should answer the many questions raised by the project and provide some much
needed hard evidence.
Chaired by Steering Group Vice Chairman Donald A MacKay, the
meeting was attended by Sandra Holmes of the CLU whose experience and
expertise helped guide the successful buyout in North Harris earlier this
year. Ms Holmes was keen to point out that at this early stage the community
had nothing to lose by investigating the full potential of a possible buyout
saying, “many people will still be undecided about the merits of such a
proposal and quite rightly so – much more information is needed. All that is
being asked of you now, is that you give it some thought - whether you are
for it or against it, it is important that you become involved.”
The Steering Group leading the project began the process in
March when a leaflet outlining the proposal was delivered to homes
throughout Ness and the West side. Mr Mackay accepted there were problems
with distribution, “not everyone had a copy but of the 170 responses the
group did receive, over 90% were in favour. A positive enough return to take
the project on to the next stage.”
If the planned feasibility study can prove a worthy case for
the takeover of the estate, the entire community would be balloted to gauge
their response. If the majority were in favour, the community would form a
limited company and then make a bid to the Scottish Executive to be allowed
the right to buy. The exact percentage required will not be known until the
details of the act are thrashed out over the coming months. If the case
presented is strong enough to convince the Scottish Executive, the go ahead
will be granted and the District Valuation Office will be commissioned to
set a fair value for the estate.
The price of the land will not be known until after the
application has been approved but is likely to include a considerable
speculative price tag based on the possible development of the AMEC wind
farm. When the valuation is published, the community would have 21 days to
decide whether or not to commit to the purchase and then only a further 6
months to secure the necessary funds.
The Scottish Land Fund would provide most of the money needed
to buy the estate but the community would have to find 6% of the purchase
price itself. Given that our community could stand to make considerable
profits if the wind farm goes ahead, the outside world might not be quite as
generous with its donations as it was with islanders of Eigg.
If the buyout is successful it would be run by a community
company, limited by guarantee to ensure that in the event of any future
failure, the company members would be liable for only £1. The company would
be non-profit making, ploughing any gains back into the estate and the
community. The legislation that will make all this possible is the new Land
Reform Act which came onto the statute books in February this year but will
not be operational until the Autumn when its full working code is published.
The act makes provision for two types of buyout - a Community
Right to Buy which allows any community the right of first refusal if the
land comes up for sale - and the Crofting Community Right to Buy which
recognises the particular needs of fragile crofting communities by allowing
them the right to buy with or without the landlord’s agreement. The
provisions of the act will not alter in any way the rights of crofters nor
will it have any affect on grant applications or any other crofting
business. Although it is assumed that any community bid for the estate
would be a hostile one, it is not yet known whether the present owners,
given the new law, would be willing to come to some amicable agreement.
The estate could stand to gain from an inflated land value
based on the promise of a Wind Farm development which might never happen -
if that promise failed to materialise and the land was not sold, the estate
would return to its original, more modest value.
Public meetings will be held on a regular basis throughout
the coming months and the steering group are urging as many people as
possible to become involved in the process whatever their opinion - they are
particularly keen to gain further representation from the crofting
community. The group can be contacted through Fiona Cowan at Iomairt Nis.
The next meeting is expected to be in Ness Hall next month. |
| |
|

|
| |
|
Windfarm
development - the gathering storm
Fios - 28 March 2003
RIGHT: The Butt of Lewis Lighthouse in Ness, standing at 37 metres
in height, is superimposed to scale beside an 80 metre high (tower
height) that was built in Denmark.
Absentee landlord will be the main winner in turbines massive windfall-
£1000 per year per crofter - £420,000 per year for the landlord
WITHIN
the next six months the precise location of each proposed wind turbine
on the Ness and West Side moor will be known and some of the enormous
structures are likely to be less than one mile from homes. |

|
|
|
The news was
given at a meeting in Airidhantuim school last week attended by around 70
local people. John Price of AMEC, the main developer of the proposed
windfarm across the Lewis moorland, revealed that as most of the peatlands
area is specially protected by European legislation, development at the
northern end will be confined to a narrow strip between the villages and the
protected area. He explained the need to reconcile the windfarm with the
concerns of SNH, the Civil Aviation Authority and the MOD and confirmed they
had now addressed most of the issues to the satisfaction of these various
bodies.
Detailed
surveys had been carried out on the habitat and flight activities of rare
birds in order that the turbines can be carefully sited to have minimum
impact on species like plover, merlin and diver which feed and nest in the
area. However, further investigation of the road layout an | |